New Delhi: The HRD ministry has
ordered an inquiry into a series of allegations against Aligarh
Muslim University’s vice-chancellor PK Abdul Aziz. The charges
against him include financial, administrative and academic
impropriety, reported Times of India Tuesday.
According to Times News Network,
HRD minister Kapil Sibal confirmed that a probe had been ordered.
Sources said it was ordered after Aziz’s response to the show cause
notice issued by the President, who is AMU’s visitor, was not found
satisfactory. In fact, a section of the executive council (EC) has
disputed the reply given by Aziz to President’s notice. They claim
that a meeting of EC called by Aziz to reply to the President’s
notice did not come to any conclusion and, therefore, the reply to
the allegations should be considered as that of the VC and not the
EC.
On the basis of
Aziz’s response to the President, EC members cite 20 cases in which
Aziz has allegedly bungled.
It is alleged
that Aziz was already facing an inquiry against him by the Kerala
government for alleged financial bungling at Cochin University of
Science and Technology. In his reply to the President, he is
believed to have admitted that there was a probe against him at
Cochin University of Science and Technology but stated that the
Kerala government had dropped a few allegations against him.
Another allegation against Aziz is that AMU paid income
tax for both him and the AMU registrar. Aziz admitted in his reply
to the President that the income tax was paid by AMU but claimed it
was now a loan. However, in an RTI reply, there is no mention of the
loan. Also, there is no provision in AMU to provide loans to pay
income tax.
Aziz, who has also been accused of a poor academic record
and plagiarism, said his academic record had nothing to do with his
functioning as V-C.
Aziz is also believed to have transferred Rs 8 crore of
Provident Fund money from State Bank of India to Shreyas Gramin Bank
violating AMU statutes. Though Aziz said he was authorised by the
executive council to do so, a section of EC said it was a false
claim.
There are also
charges of Aziz having misused large sums for refurbishing his
house, and violating TA/DA and home travel concession rules. Aziz
has, however, either denied them or claimed precedence.
|