SC begins hearing on petitions seeking deferment of Ayodhya verdict

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday began crucial hearing on a plea seeking deferment of the Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute.

The hearing before a three-judge special bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia started with senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi putting forth arguments on behalf of a retired bureaucrat Ramesh Chand Tripathi on why the delivery of the verdict be postponed and efforts be made to reach an amicable settlement outside the court.

Besides the Chief Justice, the special bench also includes Justices Aftab Alam and K S Radhakrishnan. It began hearing on the special leave petition at sharp 10.30 am.

The apex court, on September 23, had stayed for a week the High Court verdict, which was to be pronounced on September 24, after the retired bureaucrat approached it to explore a possibility of an out-of-court settlement.

The apex court had passed the interim stay amidst sharp differences of opinion on the issue of staying the verdict between Justices R V Raveendran and Justices H L Gokhale.

Keeping in view of their differences, the bench of Justices Raveendran and Gokhale, while issuing a notice on the plea, referred it to the Chief Justice for constittuing a larger bench.

Tripathi's petition pleaded for exploring the possibility of an out-of-court settlement on the 60-year-old Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit dispute.

The court had also asked Attorney General G E Vahanvati to be present and assist the court when the matter comes up for hearing on Tuesday.

Today's crucial hearing assumed significance as the Sunni Central Waqf Board and Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, two opposite parties to the title suit, have ruled out the scope of reconciliation in their affidavits filed in the apex court.

Justice Raveendran was of the view that the special leave petition filed by Tripathi should be dismissed while Justice Gokhale was of the opinion that a notice should be issued for exploring the option of settlement.

Notwithstanding his reservations, Justice Raveendran, who was heading the bench, preferred to go along with Justice Gokhale in making one attempt to find a settlement.

The apex court will also address the crisis which may arise as a fall out of the deferment of the verdict as one of the three judges of the Allahabad High Court Bench, Justice D V Sharma, who has heard the matter at length, is due to demit office on October one.

Home | Top of the Page

Comment on this article

News Pick

Top Stories

Sunni Wakf Board says Ayodhya verdict delay petition untenable

The Sunni Central Wakf Board Monday said the petition by retired bureaucrat Ramesh Chandra Tripathi seeking the deferment of the Allahabad High Court's verdict in the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi title case was "untenable, misconceived  »

Another petition in SC seeking postponement of Ayodhya Verdict

  Most Read

Adopt technology for growth in education : Intel India chief

The world's cheapest laptop developed by Indian students is encouraging for the education sector of the country as technology-adoption is crucial for the growth   »

Toronto Indians raise $320,000 for poor kids in India

The Indo-Canadian community here raised $320,000 for the welfare of poor children in India at a fund-raising gala attended by former president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. The Sunday-night gala was organised by the Toronto chapter of All India Movement (AIM) for Seva which is dedicated to   »